Search for: "White v. Reed*"
Results 61 - 80
of 357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Kentucky v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release White House Appoints 2010-2011 Class of White House Fellows Yesterday, the White House announced the appointment of 13 outstanding men and women to serve as White House Fellows. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:06 am
I seriously doubt the IRS “lost your records” – in the end I bet you’ll find the “mistakes” are right there in black & white – the wrong forms, the wrong entries, the wrong expectations. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am
Today, in Reed v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
ArcSoft, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:59 am
The court also rejected the employee’s argument that the employer’s failure to produce attendance records should have raised a negative inference—having failed to file a motion to compel, his attorney could not now complain (Reed v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
” White had also qualified this statement by noting that, “as a citizen,” she may “share” some of the disclosure mandates’ goals (she mentioned the Dodd-Frank Act’s mine safety and conflict minerals provisions) but that, “as the [then-] Chair of the SEC,” White had to question this use of the securities laws. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Video Software Dealers Association and Ortiz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:37 am
Shaw Androcles & Lion (1916) 37 What he would have called my faith has been oozing away minute by minute whilst I've been sitting here. 1915 V. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 6:57 am
Shelton further testified that two men arrived to purchase the laptop and that both men were black—one wearing a white tank top and one wearing a black sleeveless shirt. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm
Louis and Davis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:37 pm
The relationships between DOJ and the White House will need to be mended. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Wollschlaeger v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:11 pm
Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging) In a recent posting, Ilya Somin says the following: “Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:25 pm
– from legal marketing consultant Paula Black on her In Black and White blog Is Your Password Still "123456"? [read post]
