Search for: "Williams v. Hoffman" Results 61 - 80 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Chandler WL, Jelacic S, Boster DR, Ciol MA, Williams GD, Watkins SL, Igarashi T, and Tarr PI. (2002). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The opinion also includes this footnote of interest: This is not a case like Williams v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:43 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- Last year, Sandoz filed a declaratory judgment action against Amgen and Roche related to its etanercept biosimilar drug product, which it developed to compete with Amgen's Enbrel® TNF inhibitor. [read post]
”[23] Regulating defendant’s publication stricter than other newspapers and magazines was not only unfair in this case, but unconstitutional.[24] Similarly, in Hoffman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
United States, by Joseph William SingerMark the Plumber v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 2010 WL 3034453, at *22 (N.J. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
Lack of assessment of features 'commonplace' in current papercut works DJ Clarke outlined the correct approach to be used in comparing artistic works, as that of Lord Hoffman in Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textile) Ltd. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:29 am by James Hamilton
There will always be a penumbral area where views may reasonably differ, said Lord Hoffman and Dame Arden.In his opinion in Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v William Grant & Sons Distillers Limited, Lord Hoffmann said that, although the requirement that the initial computation must give a true and fair view involves the application of a legal standard, the courts are guided as to its content by the expert opinions of accountants as to what the best current… [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Dave Hoffman] Walden v. [read post]