Search for: "Williams v. Stevens" Results 61 - 80 of 1,458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22 Maclennan… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2023, judgment was handed down in Bukhari v Bukhari [2023] EWHC 427 (KB) by Steyn J. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,[3] languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Stevens, 559 U.S. 460, 468 (2010) (citing Giboney but using "speech integral to criminal conduct" as a generic name for the exception); United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am by John Elwood
Justice William Brennan delivered the opinion of the court. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm by Guest Author
In 2002, after a series of accounting scandals involving Enron and WorldCom, Congress swiftly passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in an effort to restore investors’ confidence in the market. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Mark Graber
For the Balkinization 20th Anniversary Symposium How constitutions work and can be made to work better is the fundamental question of constitutional theory. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
Steven Nissen, on the supposed risk of heart attack from the use of rosiglitazone (Avandia).[2] Within days, lawsuits were filed against the manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, which ultimately paid over six billion dollars in settlements and costs.[3] Only after the harm of this mass tort was largely complete, the results of a mega-trial, RECORD,[4] became available, and the FDA changed its regulatory stance on rosiglitazone.[5] More recently, on October 17, 2022, the Journal of the National… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am by jonathanturley
” Justice Stevens offered a more limited dissent in calling for a remand to consider the study further. [read post]