Search for: "Williams v. Strickland"
Results 61 - 80
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Strickland Northern District of Ohio at ClevelandSUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:30 pm
WILLIAM L. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Rounding out the reruns is Williams v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
” The Florida Supreme Court, 5-2, in Kirk Douglas Williams v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Williams, 11-465) – both one-time relists in which the Court denied cert. yesterday. [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:41 am
William H. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
Strickland said. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
Strickland in Ohio has granted a commutation to Sidney Cornwell, which means, save for the Baze v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:01 pm
See Williams v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm
“Given the evidence presented at the PCRA hearing, we cannot conclude [trial counsel's] investigation met his responsibility under Strickland, as further explained in Williams and Wiggins, to pursue all reasonable avenues for developing mitigation evidence. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am
Latif v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Williams: The Court found that Mr. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Wiggins: Standby counsel appointed by Court does not violate self-representation right. 1984 Strickland v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:20 pm
From this week’s edition: Leading off this edition is the Supreme Court’s sweeping, albeit noncapital, decision in Padilla v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:30 am
Supreme Court ruling in Gregg v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Kirk Douglas Williams v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
” In Strickland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
Experimental Psychol., Learning, Memory & Cognition, 378 (2011). [4] Strickland v. [read post]
