Search for: "Wilson v. Sharp" Results 61 - 80 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
  Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp, Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
When Barack Obama nominated her to the Supreme Court in 2010, Kagan approached the Senate hearings in a highly respectful manner, notwithstanding her previous sharp criticism. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Blog has coverage. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has coverage. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Brett Wilson’s Media Law Blog has considered the case at length. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has considered whether a reasonable expectation of privacy is applicable in relation to a spent conviction, illustrated by the recent case of  XKF v BBC [2018] EWHC 1560 (QB). [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 19 and 20 June 2018 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Capitol Visitor Center, HVC-200, 1st Street NE, Washington, DC Information Law and Policy Centre’s Annual Conference on 23 November 2018 at IALS, London Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Bauer Media v Wilson (No.2) ([2018] VSCA 154) the Victoria Court of Appeal reduced Rebel Wilson’s damages award in her defamation case from AUS$4.6 to AUS$600,000. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has considered the case of Mezvinsky & Anor v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWHC 1261 (Ch) which provides guidance to claimants as to which division of the High Court is most appropriate to issue a privacy claim. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Brett Wilson’s Media Blog has covered a Crown Court Judge’s appearance in Southwark Crown Court having been charged under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 for unauthorised access to the courts case management system. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Rulings               IPSO has published a series of rulings and three Resolution Statements from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 18923-17 Dixon v The Sun, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 20931-17 Dixon v Sun.co.uk, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement – 00918-18 Dixon v Mail Online, resolved via ISPO mediation 00916-18 The Scottish Government… [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has considered how unjustified threats of legal action may amount to harassment illustrated by the recent case of Worthington & Anor v Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1125. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has considered the costs decision in the case of Ali & Anor v Channel 5 Broadcast Ltd [2018] EWHC 840 (Ch). which involved the consideration of Part 36 offers, apologies and procedural issues such as the Defendants’ failure to serve a costs budget. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  The Brett Wilson Media Blog has a post about the case. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
On 17 and 18 April 2018 the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Economou v Freitas. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Wilson v Bauer Media (Costs) [2018] VSC 161 John Dixon J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on an indemnity basis. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 12 February 2018, the Court of Appeal (McFarlane and Sharp LJJ and Sir John Laws) handed down judgment in the case of Stocker v Stocker [2018]  EWCA Civ 170. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has briefly considered comments by UK Prime Minister Theresa May regarding the review of social media laws by the Law Commission. [read post]