Search for: "Winkler v. Winkler"
Results 61 - 80
of 242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
For other exceptions due to collective bargaining agreements or for other reasons, see Winkler v Kingston Housing Authority, 259 A.D. 2d 819 and Robinson v New York City Transit Authority, 226 AD2d 467. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 2:28 pm
Winkler of the Seyfarth Shaw law firm take a look at the Second Circuit’s August 5, 2022 decision in Murray v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 6:26 am
These criteria were established in the 2007 Florida 3rd District Court of Appeals decision in FDOT v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
Not surprisingly, yesterday’s decision in DC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:07 am
City of Chicago and patent law case, Bilski v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:47 am
In light of this history, Scalia’s 2008 opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:46 am
Winkler of Daly Law Associates, LLC, Gillette, Wyoming.Representing Appellee CMS Oil & Gas Co. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:55 am
Next week the blog will host an online symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:56 am
Last week in a 5-4 decision in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:30 pm
Judge Erdmann's concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:00 am
The court explained that the Plaintiffs failed to state a claim that the provision that hearing examiners of a municipality's parking violations bureau "shall not be considered employees of the city in which the administrative tribunal has been established" is unconstitutional, having failed to identify any State law or regulation independent of the Constitution that confers upon a property interest in the employment status they seek, being deemed to be an employee of a municipality… [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:00 am
The court explained that the Plaintiffs failed to state a claim that the provision that hearing examiners of a municipality's parking violations bureau "shall not be considered employees of the city in which the administrative tribunal has been established" is unconstitutional, having failed to identify any State law or regulation independent of the Constitution that confers upon a property interest in the employment status they seek, being deemed to be an employee of a municipality… [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 9:11 am
& Parole v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:12 am
[Mayo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:31 am
In a landmark decision in Perry v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
His scholarly (yet dramatic) historic narrative uses the 2008 Supreme Court Case of District Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 7:59 am
Click the following links below to read the amicus briefs filed yesterday in support of the petitioner in the upcoming case District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:38 am
” [Mayo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:07 am
Case Information AIC Limited v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 2:02 pm
[Volokh Conspiracy] * Maryland v. [read post]
