Search for: "Wood v. United States of Ame" Results 61 - 80 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:56 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The agent also stated that lying about the country of origin on customs documents constitutes a material false statement in violation of the federal criminal code, citing United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:00 pm
Attorney for State: Arthur Thaddeus Perry, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Filter Specialists, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
For the most part these trade disputes have been with the United States before NAFTA and Canada-U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 12:31 pm by Patti Spencer
" These Elizabethan poor laws became the model for the United State legislation on the same subject. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
I am not alone in thinking that Wilson deserves more attention. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
Royal Dutch Petroleum (issued today by a 2nd Circuit panel of Judge Cabranes writing for himself and Judge Wood, and a concurrence in the judgment by Judge Leval). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:20 am by Stewart Baker
Details are still a little sparse, but some kind of deal was essential for the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
 Section 2: Any purchase, sale, or other exchange involving goods or services in the United States must be conducted in U.S. dollars. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The employee filed a human rights complaint in Wood v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm by Marty Lederman
Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc. (1968), and United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:18 pm by Ryan Calo
But were a court to hold that Google’s algorithms “know” my emails the way a human employee would—and, accordingly, that I no longer have a reasonable expectation of privacy under United States v. [read post]