Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2007, 9:21 am
Courtesy of ProfessorBainbridge.com, here are a few excerpts from the Chancery Court's findings of fact:Hollinger Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 pm
The long-awaited judgment in Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Limited is the right decision. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The defence of fair comment was last considered by the House of Lords in Telnikoff v Matusevitch ([1992] 2 AC 343). [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 9:20 am
The case of KSJ v WRW [2008] EWCA Civ 1207 was reported yesterday on Bailli. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
R (HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, R (PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa, BH (AP) and another v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland), KAS or H (AP) v The Lord Advocate and another (Scotland) and Genoa Filipek-Kwasny v Polish Judicial Authority, heard 5 – 8 March 2012. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:45 am
It was sufficient to observe that the difference, if any, between the treatment of those two categories of people is not anomalous and arises from the wording of the 1981 Act (as amended). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
Lady Hale at [99] noted that whilst the court would not always take the government’s word for it, foreign policy and national security were government business. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am
They adopted a very straightforward approach: the wording used in the statute was clear. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 12:48 am
(Opinion in USA v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 6:34 am
Lord Justice ThorpeA summary of Sharbatly v Shagroon [2012] EWCA Civ 1507 (21 November 2012).Sometimes you wonder how it can be that certain apparently obvious matters can be argued all the way up to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:32 am
On findings of fact, exercising discretion, and case management he said “common law trial judges almost always have, and should have, not only the first word, but also the last word”. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:21 am
(See Rogers v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
The High Court began by emphasising that it considered the words “significant wider public interest” gave the Lord Chancellor a wide discretion. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
But in the subsection it has applied the word to circumstances different from those to which the ECtHR has applied it. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
‘A lot’, the press would answer” – these were the memorable words of Lord Rodger in the Supreme Court in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1 [63]. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:03 am
Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge heard the appeal, the first mounted by the FCA since it came into existence after the Financial Services Act 2012, on 13 October 2016 and reserved judgment. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:47 am
The Supreme Court then said its piece on James v UK. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:20 am
Various remedies were ordered, including an injunction to prevent Fox using word 'glee' as the name of the TV series (except to say the show was formerly known as 'glee'). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:33 am
The Trade Union Congress was influential in getting them included in the Act, and my friend Lord Lloyd of Kilgerran took the leading role (I think) in piloting them through Parliament, but they hardly ever deliver for the employee-inventor (Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat) being the single swallow that could not make a summer). [read post]
