Search for: "Word v. Motorola, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
Sybase 365, Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Motorola, Inc., ___ A.2d ___, 2009 WL 3459991, at *_ & n. 32(D.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:00 pm
" More significantly, however, the Second Circuit in Motorola, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46) Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP) Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Oleg Teterin seeks ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ for rights to use ;-) emoticon, a registered Russian trade mark (Techdirt) (RelatIP) (Ars Technica) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Class 46) New UK copyright consultation: consultation issues include access to works, incentivising investment and creativity, recognising… [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:03 am
***Separately-->Michael Sullivan's IPLawOutline.Note, for example, in discussing Medegen MMS, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 12:27 am
In Motorola Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess,… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Motorola, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:49 am
" Nextel Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
Respondents are Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. and Motorola. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
Cedric Kushner Promotions, Inc., 417 F. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 8:00 pm
Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
By Eric Goldman Associated Press v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:52 am
In addition to claims against Charter, the plaintiffs also sued Motorola, Inc. and Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., both of whom supplied Charter with the cable boxes used in customer homes. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:15 am
Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., et al., respondents, defendants below, Scientific-Atlanta and Motorola, were equipment vendors of Charter Communications. [read post]
