Search for: "Works v Works"
Results 61 - 80
of 106,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2008, 10:53 am
Regina (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions House of Lords “The policy of disentitling persons without accommodation from receiving the disability premium to which they would otherwise be entitled in their income support amounted to discrimination within article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights but was lawful as it could be justified on policy grounds. [read post]
1 May 2007, 2:08 am
Overpaid benefit not recoverable Regina (Balding) v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “A citizen of a European Union member state who had no right to live in the United Kingdom under domestic or European law, even though she was lawfully present, was not eligible for income support. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:24 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Yates [2009] EWCA Civ 479; [2009] WLR (D) 184 “A Canadian widow who, on her marriage to a British national in Canada, received a British pension based on her husband's contributions and paid at the rate applicable to the inflation uprating he received, frozen at the time he [...] [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:40 am
Martin v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “The value of a property in France held by a social security recipient living in France could be included in his capital, thus depriving him of his benefit even if the property was held on trust for a third party since an implied trust was unknown in French law. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:50 am
Casewell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; [2008] WLR (D) 86 “A direct payment of carer's allowance made to a disabled person for securing the provision of care by her husband formed part of the husband's earnings for the purposes of assessing his entitlement to income support. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:33 am
Overview: In Swenson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:20 am
However, as the Ontario Superior Court of Justice’s recent decision in Thambapillai v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 7:14 pm
The recent Ed Thielking v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 9:24 am
”The Supreme Court explained in Mills Music, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:37 am
In McLeod v. 1274458 Ontario Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 9:43 pm
I say that because I know that anything said about […] The post Additional work and proportionality appeared first on GWS Law. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 7:52 pm
” Harris v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 12:03 pm
The case is Bath Iron Works Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 9:25 am
Last week, the Second District California Court of Appeal ruled that on-call employees are entitled to reporting time pay if they are required to contact the employer to see whether they must actually report to work (Ward v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:58 am
Deane v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 699; [2010] WLR (D) 162 “In determining whether a claimant seeking Carer’s Allowance was ‘receiving full-time education’, so as to be excluded, it was erroneous to ask how many hours were actually spent on the activities which were defined within the applicable Regulations. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:14 am
R (Tilianu) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 1397; [2010] WLR (D) 320 ” ‘Employment’ within the meaning of art 7(3)(b) and (c) of Directive 2004/38/EC did not include self-employment, with the result that an EU citizen who was no longer self-employed did not retain the status of worker and had no right to reside. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:37 am
R (RJM) v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:51 am
State v. [read post]
