Search for: "YOUNGER v. THE STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 1,909
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
YouTube supplemented these self-designations with an automated classifier designed to identify content that was likely directed at children younger than 13.9 In so doing, YouTube effectively shifted liability under COPPA to the channel owners, who could face up to $42,530 in fines per video if they fail to self-designate and are not detected by YouTube’s classifier. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by SHG
Samford University; and Judge Kim Wardlaw, a very liberal Clinton nominee, eviscerated Arizona State’s lawyer during oral argument for the pathbreaking decision, Schwake v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by M. Jeanette Pitts
Because the new statute does not include the procedural protections present in the federal pretrial detention statute upheld in United States v. [read post]
The five categories of protected characteristics remain as those stated in the Interim Report, namely: (i) age, (ii) nationality, (iii) sex, marital status, pregnancy status, caregiving responsibilities, (iv) race, religion, language, and (v) disability and mental health conditions. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 10:25 pm by Anthony Zaller
  Is it merely a shift in priorities among the younger generation, seeking better work-life balance? [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:02 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Attorneys fighting for victims of decades-old child sexual abuse, the March 2023 Third District Court of Appeals’ ruling in Doe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:51 pm by Frank Cranmer
Though not expressly stated in her decision letter, the Secretary of State’s position had been that the starting point for the FtT should properly have been that the younger son, now an adult, could return to India with his mother [18]. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Laura Dooley
”The procedural issue presented in Dupree v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am by Jan von Hein
The respective rule invalidated marriages contracted validly according to the national law of the intended spouses if one of them was younger than 16 years of age (Art. 13 ss 3 no 1 EGBGB). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm by NARF
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]