Search for: "Yoo v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Marissa Miller
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
And amid all of that activity, the court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am by Hilary Hurd, Elena Chachko
” In addition, Russia has accused the United States of violating the INF. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:46 pm
Public enemies of the United States have never been afforded the protections of the Bill of Rights. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
  On this blog, Orin Kerr previewed the search-related issue presented in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
But the fact of the matter is that it is, in fact, the United States military that is in control of these detainees. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am by Oona A. Hathaway
Tellingly, while the Obama administration retracted John Yoo’s infamous legal opinions on torture, Yoo’s equally problematic legal opinions on the use of force still stand. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Summit Asset Strategies Investment Management, LLC; Summit Asset Strategies Wealth Management, LLC; and Chris Yoo Case Number: 15-cv-01429 (United States District Court for the Western District of Washington) Date Filed: September 4, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 6, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-144 SEC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 4:40 pm
Moussaoui v. the United States Transcripts of the hearing in which Zacarias Moussaoui attempted to plead guilty (PDF), the hearing (PDF) at which he did, and the trial session at which he testified. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:58 am by Ilya Somin
One of the most notable ambiguities in Kavanaugh's record is the question of what he really thinks about the validity of the United States v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:53 am
But if it ever did, then of course what the United States itself argued about attorney culpability in the Justice Case could be pertinent to any claims and defenses raised in such an international tribunal.4. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
Briefly: At Concurring Opinions, Robert Schapiro comments on the potential implications that the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]