Search for: "Young v. Park" Results 61 - 80 of 861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2022, 11:33 am by Michael Oykhman
As discussed in R v Aird, 2014 ONCA 447 some of these include: The age difference between the accused and young person; The degree of control, or persuasiveness exercised by the accused over the young person; and The evolution of their relationship. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 12:57 pm by David Oscar Markus
See Young, 570 U.S. at 9 (attorneys “must not be permitted to make unfounded and inflammatory attacks on the opposing advocate”); United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
The obvious issue beyond the alleged negligence of the Park is the plaintiffs’ own conduct. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(I will note that even the hallowed grounds of pitching mounds in major league baseball parks are now stamped with corporate logos.) [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 8:04 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000Read More [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, it almost had that High Chancellor Adam Sutler look from V for Vendetta. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 5:25 pm
(Appellate Division)Silverman v Park Towers Tenants Corp. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:35 pm by Josh Blackman
(iii) certification of completion of the training required in subdivision nineteen of this section; (iv) a list of former and current social media accounts of the applicant from the past three years to confirm the information regarding the applicants character and conduct as required in subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph; and (v) such other information required by the licensing officer that is reasonably necessary and related to the review of the licensing application. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:43 am by Michael Ehline
Aviators and others say Bell V-280 Valor is safer and long overdue as a replacement. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm by Michael Ehline
Hence, the government did not owe or breach any substantive constitutional duty to the young boy or his adult guardian. [read post]