Search for: "Young v. The Young Holdings Corp., Ltd."
Results 61 - 80
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Young, “Equity,”[2] The New South Wales Bar Association (August 2007). [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(RelatIP) New procedure at the Brazilian Patent Office for the application of article 32 of the Industrial Property Law (IP tango) Canada 30 more candidates add their support for the copyright pledge (Michael Geist) CBC on copyright pledge (Michael Geist) Copyright pledge gains momentum - Green Party and New Democrats Party (NDP) candidates on board (Michael Geist) Conservative Party platform on copyright (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Michael Geist) Copyright in local election debates (Michael… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
L.J. 1345, at 1380 and the case of Young v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 12:32 am
Young v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
" Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
One need look no further than last week’s sentencing of Samuel Bankman-Fried to see the impact of noncompliance.[12] In advance of the sentencing, the Department of Justice filed hundreds of victim statements with the court.[13] The victim statements reflect the incredibly broad cross-section of people who were harmed by the fraud that Bankman-Fried was convicted of: single parents, retirees, young people, grandparents. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
Recent Expression In its most recent faithless servant case, the Court of Appeals wrote, “One who owes a duty of fidelity to a principal and who is faithless in the performance of his services is generally disentitled to recover his compensation, whether commissions or salary,” from the first act of disloyalty (Feiger v Iral Jewelry, Ltd., 41 NY2d 928 [1977]). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
According to plaintiffs, the pipeline begins with a single standardized test for the City's Gifted & Talented (G&T) programs taken by children as young as four-years-old. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
According to plaintiffs, the pipeline begins with a single standardized test for the City's Gifted & Talented (G&T) programs taken by children as young as four-years-old. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
In February 2016, the 6th Circuit, in a divided ruling that represented the views only of its author (Judge David McKeague), denied the motion to dismiss, holding that it, and not the district courts, had jurisdiction to decide challenges to the rule. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
Similarly, in Allison v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Holding Corp. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am
(Irwin Toy Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
