Search for: "Younger v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Preserving error at trial: Counsel's reference to character evidence not enough for Court of Appeals
19 May 2008, 5:22 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
Mr H is father to the younger four children. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
The same constitutional challenge was made in 2014 in State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:00 pm
Under Younger abstention, a federal civil rights action will usually be put on hold while the criminal matter is ongoing in state court. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:13 pm
Five of them were younger than Lt. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 8:00 pm
ShareKevin Younger was detained before trial at a state prison in Baltimore, Maryland. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:55 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 10:34 am
(Younger v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:25 am
Younger-Holmes Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 2:01 pm
” Litras v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:40 am
Under the Younger doctrine, federal courts have discretion to abstain from exercising jurisdiction where their judgment would interfere with an ongoing state proceeding. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm
Then in its 2012 Miller v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:16 pm
Howard Hoffman, a traveling salesman who resided in Atlanta, Georgia, brought an age discrimination suit against his former employer Parade Magazine, a New York State employer, after he was terminated and replaced by a younger employee. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:34 am
Knapton v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:04 am
Supreme Court will hear the case of the younger of the D.C. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:03 am
The state passed a law making rape of a victim younger than 12 punishable by death. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:59 pm
The district court abstained under Younger v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:44 am
The district court abstained under Younger v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:58 pm
Under Younger and its progeny, "abstention is appropriate...if (1) the state proceedings are ongoing; (2) the proceedings implicate important state interests; and (3) the state proceedings provide an adequate opportunity to raise federal questions. [read post]
