Search for: "Younger v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2023, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court issued the Dobbs decision, striking down Roe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 10:01 am
The five categories of protected characteristics remain as those stated in the Interim Report, namely: (i) age, (ii) nationality, (iii) sex, marital status, pregnancy status, caregiving responsibilities, (iv) race, religion, language, and (v) disability and mental health conditions. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 4:05 pm
The economic effects are stronger among ex-ante politically inactive and younger firms. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 10:25 pm
Is it merely a shift in priorities among the younger generation, seeking better work-life balance? [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:02 am
Attorneys fighting for victims of decades-old child sexual abuse, the March 2023 Third District Court of Appeals’ ruling in Doe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:51 pm
Though not expressly stated in her decision letter, the Secretary of State’s position had been that the starting point for the FtT should properly have been that the younger son, now an adult, could return to India with his mother [18]. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:00 am
EEOC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Younger AB 598 U.S. 729 28 5/25/23 21-454 Sackett v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Younger AB 598 U.S. 729 28 5/25/23 21-454 Sackett v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”The procedural issue presented in Dupree v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
” Merritt v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
The respective rule invalidated marriages contracted validly according to the national law of the intended spouses if one of them was younger than 16 years of age (Art. 13 ss 3 no 1 EGBGB). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:18 pm
See Kanter v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
As the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) explains in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:07 am
” Lozano v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:51 am
Similar to VCDPA, the TDPSA defines “child” as an individual younger than 13 years old. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:00 pm
Similar to VCDPA, the TDPSA defines “child” as an individual younger than 13 years old. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
