Search for: "Zale v. Zale" Results 61 - 80 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2009, 2:43 pm by John W. Arden
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
Consumers shopping for cat litter overwhelmingly identified baking soda with C & D’s Arm & Hammer cat litter products, according to the court.The court concluded that the comparisons were at least as direct as those in Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:53 pm
” Non-monetary detriments could not constitute loss, contrary to the computer users’ contention, and they alleged nothing from which a calculable loss could be inferred, the court concluded.The June 1 opinion in Del Vecchio v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
This posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Consumers could not pursue deceptive advertising claims against providers of a health care discount program as a class action because the claims were governed by the varying consumer protection laws of different states and factual variations abounded, included varying advertisements in different states, the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 4:51 pm
This posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:24 pm
This posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Infant formula purchasers alleging that Abbott Laboratories misled consumers about safety in connection with the sale of five million containers of contaminated Similac brand formula stated claims under the New York Deceptive Practices Act, Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act, the federal district court in Central Islip New York has ruled.Regardless of whether the claims… [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 3:48 pm by John W. Arden
This posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by emagraken
  In that that regard, I adopt the reasoning of Harvey J. in Zale v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 2:07 pm by April Kosten
In Beaudin v Zale Canada Co. o/a Peoples Jewellers, 2021 AHRC 155, the jewelry store refused to allow Mr. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 7:14 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent decision by the Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta in Beaudin v Zale Canada Co. o/a Peoples Jewellers provides some indication as to how human rights tribunals across Canada may deal with this challenge. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]