Search for: "Zuckerman v Zuckerman"
Results 61 - 80
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
Here, defendants met their initial burden on the motion with respect to that element (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:23 am
Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:05 am
Defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to the motion (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:49 am
Capelin Assoc. v Globe Mfg. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:32 am
Bawag v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:12 am
The Court referred to Mustapha v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 10:48 am
Related Issues: Free SpeechRelated Cases: Chevron v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 8:12 am
The Court referred to Mustapha v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 3:58 am
A party moving for summary judgment must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, offering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:17 am
Co., 272 AD2d 886, 887 [4th Dept 2000]; see generally Nowacki v Becker, 71 AD3d 1496, 1497 [4th Dept 2010]), and plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact to defeat the motion (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
” Mazurek v Metropolitan Museum of Art, supra; Zuckerman v City of New York, supra. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:23 am
., Inc. v Erie County Water Auth., 115 AD3d 1351, 1351-1353 [4th Dept 2014]). [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 5:33 pm
In Boukari v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 5:09 am
Zuckerman, 388 Mass. 8, 12-15 (1983); Informix, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:58 am
Surgicenter, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:46 am
Once such proof has been offered, the burden then shifts to the opposing party. who, in order to defeat the motion for sununary judgment, must proffer evidence in admissible form … and must ‘·show fac ts sufficient to require a trial of any issue of facf’ (CPLR 3212 [b ]; see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 427 NYS2d 595 [1980]). [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:13 am
Additionally, they failed to establish, prima facie, their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on their affirmative defenses alleging accounting malpractice (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Alskom Realty, LLC v Baranik, 189 AD3d 745 [2020]). [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:47 am
Thus, plaintiff failed to meet its burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562; New York Cas. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:51 am
Leeder v Antonucci, 195 AD3d 1592, 1593 [4th Dept 2021]; see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
” by Emily Opilo and Alex Mann for Baltimore Sun Ethics National: “Palin v. [read post]
