Search for: "c/o B. Strong"
Results 61 - 80
of 598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2021, 12:58 pm
” The Federal Circuit Decision The Federal Circuit decision was authored by Judge Hughes and joined by Judges Moore and O’Malley. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Our jurisdiction to hear Jolly's appeal of his sentence is under K.S.A. 22-3601(b)(1) STRONG v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:20 pm
B/c of independent creation as a requirement/doctrine, which sets it off from TM and patent. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
That won’t work for ROP b/c so much of the regulated stuff is art. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:46 am
Mattingly was in the neighborhood of 1625 B Dresden when she detected `a really strong chemical smell. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Also honored was attorney John B. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:02 pm
Domain names are expressive property b/c they provide a gateway to vast repositories of speech. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am
Importantly, this reading of § 315(c) does not depend on whether the later-filed petition or petitions were time-barred under § 315(b). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
Other nonimmigrant categories allow for quasi dual intent such as the O, E-1, E-2, and P categories. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
He noted that “care and support” are not components of willful abandonment under R.C. 3107.07(B)(2)(c), as they are in section (B)(2)(b) of the same statute. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:10 am
Question Presented in Thryv: Whether 35 U.8.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Maybe we have strong intuitions about preferences. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
Injunctions can’t be issued w/o likely confusion. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
But if that’s the case, then we lose Rogers, all the expressive use considerations—there’s no 1A need b/c those doctrines are meant to protect 1A interests. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:30 am
§552(b)(7)(C). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:30 am
C. ยง552(b)(7)(C). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 12:08 pm
Kantian influence over Danish © was strong and resisted this impulse. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
Combination means that you can win your TM case and be entitled neither to an injunction nor to damages or profits b/c defendant wasn’t willful infringer. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:24 am
Complementarity b/t patents and TM in industries w/low turnover and need for differentiation b/c advertising spills over to similar products, like the pharma industry. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
Ct doesn’t directly address license v. sale b/c they say it’s a sale. [read post]
