Search for: "of the Special Rules of Practice for the Minnesota Court of Appeals." Results 61 - 80 of 191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Klein responded: Thanks for your suggestion in your email below that I give black students special treatment, given the tragedy in Minnesota. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:41 am by INFORRM
TrapenceDecision Date: September 30, 2019 The Supreme Court of Appeal of Malawi ruled that a series of protests could continue despite violence and criminality that had marred previous protests. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 pm by Elliot Setzer
Research Fellow, The Future of Free Speech The Future of Free Speech project is hiring a research fellow specialized in the intersection of free speech and technology. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 7:13 pm by Bryn Miller
Blaisdell, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a Minnesota law that restricted foreclosures on mortgages during the Great Depression. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
House anytime soon, according to a Rules Committee report. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If there are to be fraud class actions at all, this is a necessary rule, and changing the common law rules that prevented such inferences was the basic reason that states enacted consumer protection laws in the first place. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
A panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled a District Court judge erred in 2017 when he dismissed a lawsuit challenging profits Trump has received from foreign officials doing business with his Washington, D.C. luxury hotel and other Trump-branded properties. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” IRS Issues Proposed Rules to Reduce Donor Disclosure Requirements Following Court Ruling The Hill – Naomi Jagoda | Published: 9/6/2019 The Treasury Department and IRS issued proposed rules to reduce donor disclosure requirements for certain tax-exempt groups after a federal judge set aside guidance the agencies had previously released on the topic because it had not gone through a notice and comment period. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Appeals Court Judges Send Emoluments Suit Against Trump Back to a Lower Court New York Times – Sharon LaFraniere | Published: 7/19/2019 A federal appeals court delivered a setback to a lawsuit by congressional Democrats accusing President Trump of illegally benefiting from his business interests while in office, saying a lower court judge hearing the suit had not adequately considered questions about the separation… [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
South Africa EFF has attempted to appeal the decision of Johannesburg High Court in the case of case of Trevor Andrew Manual (Manuel) versus the EFF and others (the EFF). [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Assange case, I expect, will be much more likely to go up on appeal, and to draw broad public attention. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
MinnesotaMinnesota Lawmakers, Lobbyists Describe Cautious Capitol in Wake of #MeTooMinneapolis Star Tribune – Jessie Van Berkel | Published: 4/21/2019 A year and a half after reports of sexual harassment rocked the Minnesota Legislature and prompted two resignations, lawmakers and lobbyists describe a changed atmosphere at the Capitol. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
MinnesotaMinnesota Lawmakers, Lobbyists Describe Cautious Capitol in Wake of #MeTooMinneapolis Star Tribune – Jessie Van Berkel | Published: 4/21/2019 A year and a half after reports of sexual harassment rocked the Minnesota Legislature and prompted two resignations, lawmakers and lobbyists describe a changed atmosphere at the Capitol. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
(i.e. birthday greetings, holiday invitations, condolences, days of special meaning, family events, etc. etc.) are impacted. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
The move means the matter will skip over the Oregon Court of Appeals, where cases can languish for years and will be heard by the justices later this year. [read post]