Search for: "v. United States Attorney General" Results 61 - 80 of 13,606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
And those 26 states have now been joined by the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Should the state attorneys general have investigated Starbucks for not proclaiming the warnings of WHO? [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 5:12 am
Nebraska Attorney General's Office. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm by Luke Rioux
Holland had prevented some bird hunting within the state and one of the people he stopped happened to be the State's Attorney General. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:45 am by FM Librarian
Sessions Bodes Well for Overturning Matter of A-B- (ImmigrationProf Blog, July 2018) [text]Related posts:- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 1 (24 July 2018)- News: New Legal Decision on Domestic Violence (15 June 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:49 am
[hereinafter Reuters, Judge strikes down plea][2] Id.; See United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:35 pm by Bill Otis
  In today's climate, Georgetown deserves credit for inviting Jeff Sessions (although it should scarcely be remarkable that a law school, of all places, would invite the Attorney General of the United States).Second, there are complaints that not everyone who would have liked to be in the audience was accommodated. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 10:35 am
07/08/09 press release by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley:BOSTON Today, Attorney General Martha Coakley filed a lawsuit in United States District Court (D. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:36 am by Immigration Prof
Supreme Court website Lyle Denniston on SCOTUSBlog reports that the Texas Attorney General has sought a 30 day extension to January 20, 2016 to respond to the U.S. government's petition for certiorari in Texas v.... [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:21 am by Ashley Deeks
 Attorney General Jeff Sessions stated that Assange’s arrest is now a “priority. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am by Ed Bates, University of Southampton
It may well have been that differences of opinion on that debate lay behind the majority and minority opinions in Hirst v United Kingdom back in 2005. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]