Search for: "v. WEINTRAUB"
Results 61 - 80
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 8:05 am
He brought suit under 42 USC 1983 for this retaliation and the district court dismissed the complaint, relying on Garcetti and a Second Circuit case applying Garcetti, Weintraub v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 1:02 pm
Visual Arts v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 2:10 pm
Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm
Commissioners Weintraub and Walther still serve on the FEC. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 1:40 pm
Case discussed: Lenz v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
In Soledispa v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:59 am
Post-Garcetti, the Second Circuit scaled back its generous protections under the First Amendment in Weintraub v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:20 pm
The case, Weintraub v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:32 pm
Foster v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:16 am
"The case is Weintraub v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:56 am
That Second Circuit case is Weintraub v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Circuit, in Sottera, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 2:30 pm
(Kelly v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
In [*2]addition, a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in itself, does not give rise to a private cause of action against an attorney or law firm (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814; Kallman v Krupnick, 67 AD3d 1093, 1096; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254, 254). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 9:08 pm
.' Caro v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:58 am
” Weintraub v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
In 2010, the Second Circuit did that in Weintraub v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:12 am
“Whether specific conduct constitutes legal malpractice is a factual determination to be made by the trier of fact” (Weintraub v Petervary, 57 Misc 3d 153[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 51595[U], *2 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2017]). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:28 pm
" In addition, said the Appellate Division citing Weintraub v Fraiman, 30 AD2d 784, 784-785, affirmed 24 NY2d 918, DOI may subpoena private individuals as part of its investigatory powers pursuant to §805 of “any person, even though unconnected with city employment, when there are grounds present to sustain a belief that such person has information relative to the subject the investigation. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:32 pm
Also, even though the opinion came in more than a month ago, we have multiple posts today on repercussions, or the lack thereof, from Wal-Mart v. [read post]
