Search for: "*u.s. v. Sharpe"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,412
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm
” While the U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm
” Yesterday, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel told reporters that the key assistance the U.S. would like from Turkey would be permission to use Turkish air base Incirlik and an agreement to help arm and train moderate Syrian forces. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
From the States and Municipalities: Alaska – As Energy Boom Ends, a Political Identity Crisis in Alaska New York Times – Kirk Johnson | Published: 10/8/2014 Economic anxiety in Alaska is roiling an already sharp-edged political season, focused on one of the most competitive U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
Recent Fourth Amendment caselaw draws a sharp distinction between the two. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
Apparently, the Court of Appeals agreed, finding in Kubicki v Sharpe that the dispute hinged on precisely when Mother's "active duty" commenced. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:36 pm
The U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
This holding drew a sharp rebuke from the four Justices on the dissent, who said, “Fair use is intended to allow individuals engaged in productive uses to copy small portions of original works that will facilitate their own productive endeavors. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 5:09 pm
Bogan (the Indiana case) and Wolf v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:40 pm
Though this change appears to be part of PACER’s attempt to join the 21st Century—the removal is part of PACER’s migration to its NextGen system, which is incompatible with the decades-old legacy systems holding these records—it stands in sharp contrast to the Supreme Court’s acknowledgement in Nixon v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am
In an opinion in the Post, former U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Circuit and U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Hence the age-old U.S. aphorism that any antitrust offense requires harm to competition, not merely harm to competitors. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Halbig v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:05 am
"In Sharp v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:15 am
” Paul Morrissey, U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
" That is why a unanimous Supreme Court was able to declare, in the 1982 case of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Riley v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:48 pm
“Today’s Supreme decision is a sharp reminder that the U.S. [read post]
