Search for: "A G Lewis"
Results 781 - 800
of 997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
(g) An analysis that would do credit to any rabbinical study of the Talmud (h) Follow me and you will be free. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:41 am
Lewis, 167 N.J. 91, 118 (2001).] [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
(g) An analysis that would do credit to any rabbinical study of the Talmud (h) Follow me and you will be free. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm
On 7 November 2017 the first meeting of the Media and Communications List User Group took place at the Royal Courts of Justice. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
An employee need not be a “prevailing party” to be eligible for an attorney’s fees award under ERISA’s fee-shifting provision (§1132(g)(1)), held the Supreme Court in a unanimous decision, finding that courts may award fees and costs to a fee claimant so long as he or she has achieved “some degree of success on the merits” (May 24, 2010).Lewis v City of Chicago (Dkt No 08-974). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
See Lewis v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
See, e,.g., Lexington v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:59 am
Digby Baltzell and Howard G. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:50 am
Spano, in which the Appellate Division for the 2nd Department rejected a constitutional challenge to an executive order by the Westchester County Executive, commanding agencies under his direction to afford same-sex marriages the maximum recognition available under the law, and Lewis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:36 am
Kempin, Frederick G., Jr. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:32 am
In the context of derivative litigation, many courts have interpreted their version of Model Rule 1.13(g)—Florida Rule 4-1.13(e)’s counterpart—to mean that the individuals named as a defendant to the derivative suit cannot consent to dual representation on behalf of the company. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:32 am
In the context of derivative litigation, many courts have interpreted their version of Model Rule 1.13(g)—Florida Rule 4-1.13(e)’s counterpart—to mean that the individuals named as a defendant to the derivative suit cannot consent to dual representation on behalf of the company. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm
And in terms of “humorous,” well… remember that old saw about France and Jerry Lewis? [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
Lewis, 179 N.J. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:35 pm
On October 24, 2013, in accordance with Title III of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”), the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a press release and published long-awaited proposed rules (Release Nos. 33-9470; 34-70741) (the “Proposed Rules”) to permit companies to offer and sell securities through crowdfunding (“Regulation Crowdfunding”). [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:38 am
Lewis, 222 N.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:24 pm
Finally, section 104(g) of the act provides that the Secretary, “in developing performance requirements shall take into consideration available resources and anticipated consequences of a cyber attack. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:15 am
Did G. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:00 pm
” Jack G. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:03 pm
” Jack G. [read post]
