Search for: "ADOPTION OF N. B." Results 781 - 800 of 2,860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” As to 11343.4(b)(1), the CCPA provides that “[o]n or before July 1, 2020, the Attorney General shall solicit broad public participation and adopt regulations to further the purposes of this title. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
This analysis was prepared by a select group of JD candidates at the Institute of International Economic Law (IIEL) at Georgetown University in conjunction with TradeLab. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:03 pm by Stuart Kaplow
In premises liability cases in Maryland, the state’s highest court has adopted the general rule, also applied in a majority of states with some variations, contained in Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (1965) that provides: “A possessor of land is subject to liability for physical harm caused to his invitees by a condition on the land if, but only if, he (a) knows or by the exercise of reasonable care would discover the condition, and should realize that it involves an… [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:00 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
Como sabemos, la Asamblea Legislativa adoptó luego un nuevo Código Penal en el 2012. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:50 am by Marie-Krystel Ouellet
Il faut retenir que l’employeur doit avoir un réel souci quant à la santé ou à la sécurité des employés dans ses installations lorsqu’il décide d’adopter un politique susceptible de porter atteinte aux droits fondamentaux et que les mesures de protection doivent atteindre un objectif clair et être nécessaires à la réalisation de cet objectif. [1] 2019 QCCA 1494. [2] Multani c. [read post]
18 May 2020, 5:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Nevertheless, a growing chorus of decisions, primarily in New York, have reached the opposite conclusion, reasoning that the automatic discovery stay applies ‘[i]n any private action,’” and “[n]owhere in [the PSLRA] does the statute indicate that it applies only to actions brought in federal court. [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:52 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
., Adopted Decision 2020-01, issued by the USCIS’s Administrative Appeals Office (AAO), recognized the principle of immigration “successorship in interest” in mergers, acquisitions and other forms of corporate restructuring. [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:52 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
., Adopted Decision 2020-01, issued by the USCIS’s Administrative Appeals Office (AAO), recognized the principle of immigration “successorship in interest” in mergers, acquisitions and other forms of corporate restructuring. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:10 am by Maureen Harbourt and Lauren Rucinski
The list is available at: https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/list-n-disinfectants-use-against-sars-cov-2. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:15 am by A. Sasha Mandy
Pour leur part, les bénéficiaires des licences accordées dans ce cadre s’engagent à une mise en marché large et à faible prix de leurs produits pour en faciliter l’accès. [read post]
Sections 8630-8634 provide procedures for a local emergency, which may be declared by proclamation of a city or county governing body or by an official designated by ordinance adopted by that governing body. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee B, however, was permanently appointed on March 1 of the same year, while Employee A was permanently appointed a month later, on April 1.Under the terms of the Local 788 collective bargaining agreement A would have greater seniority for layoff purposes than B. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am by Shannon O'Hare
Of particular relevance to the secondary trading market is the Ordinance n°2020-306 of 25 March 2020 on the extension of expired deadlines, as modified by the Ordinance n°2020-427 dated 17 April 2020 (the “2020 Ordinance“). [read post]