Search for: "Alexander v. United States" Results 781 - 800 of 1,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Transfers to the United States will be illegal, as will construction of facilities in the United States to house detainees. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:02 pm
But in the meantime the Administration illegally invaded the privacy of countless numbers of persons in the United States and Padilla lost three years of his life in military prisons; indeed recent reports suggest that his mental condition has been so impaired by the interrogation methods used on him that he may not be competent to stand trial. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Next up are hearings for another military commission case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm by Stephen Sachs
Katz, An Analysis of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in the United States, 109 Q.J. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 3:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Mehta and Vermeule conclude: As chief justice of the United States, Roberts's solicitude for the reputation of both the court he leads and the entire branch of government of which he is the figurative head is understandable. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Michael Brendan Dougherty explains why he has “started to think that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy may be the one man preventing the United States from political breakdown. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm by Masha Simonova
Federal sovereign immunity doctrine holds that no one can sue the United States without its consent—sovereign immunity is thus pleaded around by suing officers. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Alexander, No. 07-1758 A sentence for possessing crack cocaine with the intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not commit a plain error in designating defendant a career offender for sentencing purposes as he committed a prior crime of violence, and he otherwise satisfied the criteria necessary to be considered a career offender; and 2) the sentence was otherwise reasonable. [read post]