Search for: "Appeal of Hughes" Results 781 - 800 of 2,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Katharine Alexander, Olswang LLP
Appeal to the Supreme Court Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge heard the appeal on 13 October 2014. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Stuart Brooks, Olswang LLP
The appeal was heard on 3 November by Lord Neuberger, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:22 am by Jason Rantanen
  Without knowing more, can you predict how the court resolved the appeal? [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgment was reserved by the Court of Appeal in Cambridge v Makin on Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ). [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge unanimously allowed the appeals by consent. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:17 am
In addition, Lake hired WilmerHale to represent him on appeal, which cost another $2.27 million. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am by Sophie Corke
GuestKat Rose Hughes explained the implications of the UK's incorporation of the SPC Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 469/2009) into domestic law for UK SPC holders, with elements of both continuity and potentially critical change. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am by Aleksandra Czubek
 PATENTSRose Hughes: - reviewed the EPO Boards of Appeal recent decision in case T 1501/20, confirming lack of legal basis for mandatory ViCo proceedings absent a state of general emergency. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:39 pm by Alexandre Miura
 PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes commented on (i) a recent decision from EPO’s Board of Appeal in which it failed to find any legal basis in the EPC for the requirement that the description must be brought in line with the claims; and (ii) a recent referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union from the Finnish Market Court, which is seeking clarification on the interpretation of Article 3(c) of the SPC Regulation with respect to combination… [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 1:05 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
Image from Pixabay.Rose Hughes discussed the EPO Board of Appeal decision T 0438/22 on the legality of the requirement for the description of a patent to be amended in line with the allowed claims, especially the deletion of "claim-like clauses". [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
The Board of Appeal held that the claimed invention was novel and involved an inventive step.Trade MarksAlessandro Cerri reported on the highly anticipated judgment of the England & Wales Court of Appeal in Lidl v Tesco, which upheld the High Court's findings on bad faith, infringement, and passing off, including the findings in respect of the 'price-matching' allegation. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:23 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
GuestKat Rose Hughes echoed some of the experiences of this year’s candidates about a rather complicated start of the examination.Trade marksSpecialKat Tian Lu reviewed a decision by the Chinese First Instance Court of Hunan Province concerning the infringement of a colour trade mark owned by the Zoomlion company. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:45 am by Jocelyn Bosse
If you've been too wrapped up with preparations for the holiday season, here's a summary of the IP news that you might have missed last week:PatentsThis Kat is still contemplating which IP books to put on her Christmas wish-list...Rose Hughes outlined the recent EPO Board of Appeal decision (T 1356/21), which discussed the criterion of novelty for pharmaceutical dosage regimes and selection inventions, as well as the reliance on an unexpected technical effect… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
GuestKat Rose Hughes, in When will the appeal fee be refunded? [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Söğüt Atilla
Although the Court of Appeal confirmed that this would be the correct interpretation and application of the provision, it still considered AIM’s appeal timely and admissible due to the exceptional circumstances of this case.Rose Hughes also analysed the Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions of the USPTO. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 The decisions of the Second Section in Társaság a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2011) 53 EHRR 3) and Kenedi v Hungary (Judgment of 26 May 2009) were recognised by the Court of Appeal as giving rise to a right to access information (see generally, Antony White’s 2010 post “The emerging media Article 10 right to receive information from public authorities”). [read post]