Search for: "Arbitrator 3" Results 781 - 800 of 25,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2011, 1:36 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
§ 171.021(a) (West 2011) (court shall order parties to arbitration on application of a party showing an agreement to arbitrate and the opposing party's refusal to arbitrate). [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:15 am by Victoria VanBuren
The session  convened in Washington, D.C. on January 3, 2011 and will end on January 3, 2013. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:42 am by Victoria VanBuren
The session  convened in Washington, D.C. on January 3, 2011 and will end on January 3, 2013. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 1:59 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Upon the filing of a summary action with the court by a party to an arbitration proceeding, the court shall vacate an award in the arbitration proceeding if: (1) the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means; (2) the court finds evident partiality by an arbitrator, corruption by an arbitrator, or misconduct by  an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (3) an… [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:09 pm by Ronald Meisburg
In its press release, the Board described the current precedent this way: Under the existing standard, the Board defers to an arbitration award when (1) the arbitration proceedings are fair and regular; (2) all parties agree to be bound; and (3) the arbitral decision is not repugnant to the purposes and policies of the Act. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 7:17 am
  In a nutshell, motions to dismiss will not be granted until a party finishes presentation of their case-in-chief (i.e. - at a hearing), unless one of 3 exceptions exist: 1) prior settlement or release of party, 2) it is evidence that a respondent was not associated with the account, security or conduct at issue (mistaken identification), or 3) the claim is not eligible for arbitration (for example, the claims are too old).We'll have to watch and see how… [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 1:10 pm by Victoria VanBuren
The session  convened in Washington, D.C. on January 3, 2011 and will end on January 3, 2013. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 5:31 am
The latest issue of the Journal of International Arbitration (Vol. 33, no. 3, 2016) is out. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:21 pm
§ 7, authorize arbitrators to compel pre-hearing document discovery from entities not parties to the arbitration proceeding? [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): DCT Order Compelling Arbitration Renewed Motion to Compel Inetianbor Opposition 57-main [Cashcall Reply] 57-1 [Affidavit of Robert Chasing Hawk] 57-3 57-4 [Consumer loan agreement] Previous posts on this case are here and here. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
”; and (3) “Is there factually sufficient evidence to support the reversal of the judgment of the [AAA]? [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 8:42 am
Wachovia Securities, LLC, Respondent (FINRA Arbitration 08-00501, August 3, 2015). [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:10 am by Beth Graham
Mullenix, Morris & Rita Atlas Chair in Advocacy at the University of Texas School of Law, has authored Gaming the System: Protecting Consumers from Unconscionable Contractual Forum Selection and Arbitration Clauses, Forthcoming 66 Hasting L.J. ___ (symposium issue #3, 2015)(draft paper); U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 568. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:25 am by Mark J. Astarita, Esq.
Professor Jill Gross over at the ADR Blog has a post announcing that registration is open for PLI's program on Securities Arbitration, which she chairs. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:11 am by Beth Graham
Encourage early use of mediation to lay an appropriate, tailored foundation for arbitration, as exemplified by the Guided Choice system. 3. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 6:14 am
The latest issue of the Stockholm International Arbitration Review (Vol. 2008, no. 3) is out. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:18 am by MOTP
An arbitrator can (1) correct a mistake which is apparent on the face of his award; (2) decide an issue which has been submitted but which has not been completely adjudicated by the original award; or (3) clarify or construe an arbitration award that seems complete but proves to be ambiguous in its scope and implementation. [read post]