Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins"
Results 781 - 800
of 901
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2008, 1:20 am
See, e.g., Tison v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:01 pm
Georgia, 1977, for murder by a mentally impaired individual (Atkins v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:06 pm
As the opinion states:The existence of objective indicia of consensus against making a crime punishable by death was a relevant concern in Roper, Atkins, Coker, and Enmund, and we follow the approach of those cases here. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:14 pm
" (Justice Scalia, you may recall, filed a dissenting opinion in the Court's landmark decision in Atkins v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:43 am
The case is titled: JA Apparel Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:32 pm
And the converse, says the Ninth, saves nothing, reports Michael Atkins: On June 11, the Ninth Circuit upheld the Western District's award of attorney's fees on the false designation of origin claim in Derek Andrew, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
Atkins v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:32 pm
Supreme Court prohibited the execution of the mentally retarded in Atkins v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 11:12 am
Related Posts: Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:52 am
At 10am today, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear argument in Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:45 pm
Simmons and Atkins v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:14 pm
Simmons and Atkins v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
His view is in direct opposition to the recent decision in the 10th Circuit in US v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:04 pm
CNET; Mercier v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 6:29 pm
I haven't had time to post about all the great recent posts concerning Louisiana v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
The thing that struck me most after reading the briefs and participating in the moot was the sense of role reversal from Atkins v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Grant of habeas relief vacating petitioner's sentence of death, and ordering that he be resentenced to receive a sentence other than death, is affirmed where the Double Jeopardy Clause bars respondent-warden's claim that, even though petitioner was found to be mentally retarded on direct appeal, Ohio should be permitted to relitigate the finding now that it has taken on new legal significance in light of Atkins v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Edmondson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 2:48 am
See Bradley v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:35 am
Something else I missed last week was this interesting Employment Appeal Tribunal case, dealing with the fairness of a dismissal during paternity leave. [read post]
