Search for: "B&H, LLC"
Results 781 - 800
of 945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
The Supreme Court disagreed with the interpretation of the Partnership Agreement by the Court of Chancery and initially focused on the need to read both the Partnership Agreement and the related LLC Agreement together because both agreements described how the general partner managed Boardwalk. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
In the August 2010 volume of The Colorado Lawyer, Ronald M. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
Custer Battles LLC, 376 F. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
BlackwellS11A0009 (civil case)July 5, 2011BENHAM, Justice.In January 2009, appellee Fred B. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
Pharia, LLC, No. 13-13-00551-CV, 2014 WL 3555529 (Tex. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
B. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
P. 26(b)(3)(A); Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1970 Amendment; 8 FED. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
There are 23 water right holders likely to be impacted by the orders. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/press_room/press_releases/2021/mill-and-deer-creek-curtailment-press-release-final-9.22.21-updated.pdf For more information see: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-10/drought-emergency-now-extends-to-4-1-california-counties-newsom-says… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
There are 23 water right holders likely to be impacted by the orders. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/press_room/press_releases/2021/mill-and-deer-creek-curtailment-press-release-final-9.22.21-updated.pdf For more information see: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-10/drought-emergency-now-extends-to-4-1-california-counties-newsom-says… [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff,v.MOSS LAW FIRM, P.C., Defendant.Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-2449-D.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm
The federal government uses its contracting dollars not only to purchase the supplies and services it needs, but also to support broader policy goals. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Tourtelot & Butler and Robert H. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
D/B/A LAS COLINAS MEDICAL CENTER v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
., AND JAMES H. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
Id. at 579-80 (interpreting provision in an LLC agreement, which comported in large part with the Delaware statute on advancements, and asserting that retaining counsel for appearance before a grand jury was likely indemnifiable). ? [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Boston Pads, LLC, 471 Mass. 566 (2015), the Federal District Court found that the ICL did not apply to a franchisor / franchisee relationship because “there is an ‘inherent conflict” between Prong A which requires the “worker” be “free from control in connection with the performance of the service” and the FTC Franchise Rule which contemplates a franchisor will “exert or [have] authority to exert a significant degree of control over the… [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
[An interesting 2014 case I just found.] [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Boston Pads, LLC, 471 Mass. 566 (2015), the Federal District Court found that the ICL did not apply to a franchisor / franchisee relationship because “there is an ‘inherent conflict” between Prong A which requires the “worker” be “free from control in connection with the performance of the service” and the FTC Franchise Rule which contemplates a franchisor will “exert or [have] authority to exert a significant degree of control over the… [read post]
