Search for: "B. Kelly" Results 781 - 800 of 1,421
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In particular, said the court, “[b]y the time a jury was selected and Dassey was tried Kachinsky was long gone from the case. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:14 pm by Mark Bennett
Kelly Case did (Kelly didn’t blog about the proceedings, but I link to his blog so that you can encourage him to write more). [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
AmeriKat looks at the Court of Justice of the European Union response to Arnold J's questions in Case C-567/16 which held that an end of procedure notice does not amount to a granted marketing authorization for purposes of Article 3(b). [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
§924(c)(3)(B), is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:50 am by John Jascob
"Ranking Member McHenry offered an amendment that would achieve three goals: (1) clarify bill text regarding the personal benefit requirement; (2) replace "relating to the market" language contained in the bill that he said was too broad in scope; and (3) strike a rule of construction regarding the application of Exchange Act Sections 10(b) and 14(e). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:31 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
He left this picture and frame to his daughter Sarah with the above proviso to prevent her from removing the diamonds from the frame to make jewelry. 5 John B Kelly Died: 1960 Last Wish: That the clothing bills of his daughter, Princess Grace, not bankrupt the principality of Monaco. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:48 am by Seán Binder
Laura Kelly reports for The Hill. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Category one is limited to a specified list of "serious physical abuse, sexual abuse or other serious conduct" (Social Services Law §493[4][a]), and category two contains conduct that "seriously endangers the health, safety or welfare of a service recipient" (Social Services Law § 493[4][b]). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:48 am
As established by the first case in which an employee was awarded compensation (Kelly & Anor v GE Healthcare [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat)), “outstanding benefit” cannot be defined. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 2:37 pm by Unknown
Chair Khan, Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya issued a statement. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:24 am by Jim Dempsey
However, in 2020, Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter began arguing that the real impediments to effective rulemaking came not from the statute but from self-imposed requirements. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Iterative but for different purpose: Kelly v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:39 am by Emma Durand-Wood
You can read a/b why I enjoy this great law blog here https://t.co/tUdamjd6Mt— Derek Wilson (@DerekWilsonLaw) December 8, 2016I wish to nominate https://t.co/c4V5h8sOwV for a #clawbies2016 award! [read post]