Search for: "Barnes v. Washington"
Results 781 - 800
of 999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2017, 12:54 pm
Barnes and Noble. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:19 am
” Briefly: Robert Barnes of the Washington Post previews Tuesday’s oral argument in Maples v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
” Robert Barnes of the Washington Post reports on calls by affirmative action foes for the Court to grant cert. in Fisher v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” In an op-ed in The Washington Post, Angela Allen-Bell urges the court to review Lambert v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes suggests that merely describing the Justices as “skeptical that corporations have ‘personal privacy’ rights” “might be an understatement. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes suggests that merely describing the Justices as “skeptical that corporations have ‘personal privacy’ rights” “might be an understatement. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
Senator Mitch McConnell’s call for Scalia’s seat to remain vacant garners particular interest, with coverage from Harper Neidig at Politico, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, and Dara Lind at Vox. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am
In their coverage, Jennifer Haberkorn of Politico, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, and Robert Barnes of the Washington Post also agree that the Court is likely to review the health care cases during its October 2011 Term. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
Lyle Denniston covered the Court’s order for this blog; Adam Liptak at the New York Times, Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, David Savage and Jennifer Martinez of the Los Angeles Times, JURIST, and Courthouse News Service also have coverage. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am
I covered the order for this blog; other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, Timothy Phelps of the Los Angeles Times, and Lawrence Hurley of Reuters. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am
” Other coverage of yesterday’s decision comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, and from Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, who spoke to the lawyers in all four cases about the next steps. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:46 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times and Robert Barnes of the Washington Post expanded their coverage for the Saturday editions, while Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor added his. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Stephen Bright weighs in on Flowers v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:09 am
In Holder v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes compares Kagan’s limited “paper trail” to that of previous nominees; he characterizes her record as “at times contradictory, or at least ambiguous. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post (subscription required) that the court announced that it “will not review a Kentucky law that requires doctors who perform abortions to give a detailed description of the fetus’s development while the woman is shown an ultrasound image, even if she objects. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
And in The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s recent remarks at the annual convention of the American Constitution Society, noting that Ginsburg attributed advances in gay rights to “the climate of the era. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The following is an opinion piece on the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:32 am
Barnes, Chronicle of Philanthropy) [Ed. [read post]
