Search for: "Barnett v. Barnett"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
Crowell v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm
These originalists maintain that the Privileges or Immunities Clause was a free standing provision, the substance of which included both the “Corfield v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 7:56 am
USA v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of… [read post]
8 May 2007, 4:26 pm
Barry "Golden Dragon" Barnett Let us serve you our free feed. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:05 pm
Berenson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In Parks v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 8:57 am
Supreme Court, in MedImmune, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Merrick v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
Barnett, 989 F.2d 546, 555 (1st Cir. 1993). [read post]
22 May 2018, 3:04 am
Greene’s Energy Group [Cato “Regulation,” Jonathan Barnett and Jonathan Stroud via Peter Van Doren] “Victory for Defendant Autonomy and the Criminal Jury Trial in McCoy v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:16 am
Barnett v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:30 pm
First, Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 3:50 pm
Barry Barnett Our feed welcomes hard-working subscribers like you. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
” Justice Gorsuch’s solo dissent from Monday’s ruling in Sveen v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:16 pm
So said a Texas court in 2001 Trinity Fund, L.L.C. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
In Lorenzo v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
Not surprisingly, yesterday’s decision in DC v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 2:21 pm
” While there is lots of blame to go around, for reasons I will explain tomorrow, I think Chief Justice’s Roberts’ decision in NFIB v Sebelius had an important role to play. [read post]
