Search for: "Base Holdings, LLC" Results 781 - 800 of 9,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 1:24 pm by Joel R. Brandes
      The district court did not hold another hearing on the second remand but ordered return based on the existing record. [read post]
25 May 2023, 7:10 am by Jill K. Bigler
The day after obtaining federal brokerage authority for the logistics company he formed a month earlier, Christopher Johnson, a North Carolina resident, resigned from his employment with Cincinnati-based Total Quality Logistics, LLC (“TQL”). [read post]
24 May 2023, 5:38 am by Linda C. Severin
The company holds sole source, fixed price prime contracts with the Air Force, Army, Navy, and other government agencies. [read post]
23 May 2023, 8:40 am by Lee E. Berlik
On October 23, 2018, while still employed by Adnet, the defendants incorporated their own company called RoLaJa, LLC. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:07 am by Peter J. Sluka
In the LLC context, the Second Department is the vanguard of the now well-worn principle that “in certain circumstances, a buyout may be an appropriate equitable remedy upon the dissolution of an LLC” (Mizrahi v Cohen, 104 AD3d 917, 920 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher
., 486 U.S. 399, 412 (1988), the Court held that a state retaliatory discharge was not preempted by Section 301 because the claim was based on independent state law, not requiring an interpretation of the CBA. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm by Eric Goldman
By plaintiffs’ own telling, their claim is based on defendants’ “provision of the infrastructure which provides material support to ISIS. [read post]
18 May 2023, 10:03 am by Amy Howe
Google LLC, back to the lower court for another look – suggesting that it too was unlikely to survive. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am by John Elwood
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, involving an undoubtedly important and recurring issue involving drug labeling and inducement of patent infringement. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:59 am by Caroline Schmitz
But, nonetheless, on May 3, 2023, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in Traffic Jam Events LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am by Unknown
As a result, the state attorneys general posited that BlackRock, CA100+, and NZAM collectively may hold voting securities at utility companies that would exceed FERC’s threshold for blanket reauthorizations.The state attorney generals assert “standing” to intervene in BlackRock’s FERC blanket reauthorization based on their interests in consumer protection, competition, and utility rates affecting state citizens and residents. [read post]