Search for: "Benefit Express Services, LLC" Results 781 - 800 of 818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 7:04 am
Co., 520 U.S. 510 (1997), the courts have required that the plan document have a "clear and express statement" that the benefits vest. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Metro Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 06-1595Title VII/retaliationo January 26, 2009 decision hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSWIKI here14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
Cooper Advisory Services Inc.NASSAU COUNTYContractsNo Express Agreement as To Sums Due, Owing Reached Dismissing Account Stated ClaimJPC Contracting Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
CNN America, Inc. and Team Video Services, LLC, Joint Employers (5-CA-31828, 33125; 353 NLRB No. 94) Washington, DC Feb. 13, 2008. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:57 am
Allow us an avenue to express ourselves and really be heard by you. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:06 am
"  Many of the commentators expressed somewhat negative sentiments about variable annuities with guaranteed living benefits. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
Top Reasons To Join The LawMarketing Listserv  You’ll be part of a community, which is the favorite benefit that members mention. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Given the above rationale for why the Economic Loss Doctrine applies in UCC cases, the Court when on to state: Unlike contracts for products or goods, which enjoy the benefit of well-developed law under the U.C.C., no such benefit exists for contracts for services. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 8:16 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
That section specifically prohibits an employer from making deductions against employee compensation unless those deductions are generally (a) in accord with the law; (b) made with the express, written authorization of the employee for her benefit (i.e., health insurance premiums). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 3:31 pm
Those interested in seeing who's on the "A" list of people getting notice of the proceedings will find the current service list here. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
Here is IP Thinktank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
Pinnacle Eye Care, LLC, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that an agreement to arbitrate claims is enforceable under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
The plan administrator, Hartford Life Insurance Co., determined that Gaeth was no longer totally disabled and terminated his benefits in 1997.Gaeth challenged that decision in court. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Catskill Mountain Mechanical Corp. and its alter ego, Plant Maintenance Services, Inc. (3-CA-26213; 352 NLRB No. 101) West Coxsackie, NY June 30, 2008. [read post]