Search for: "Bishop v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 965
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
The Senior Bishop of this Church in Presiding the order of consecration, having jurisdiction within the United States, shall be the Presiding Bishop of the Church. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:57 pm
That, in the judgment of this Council, it is perfectly consistent with the good faith which she owes to the Bishops and Dioceses with which she has been in union since 1862, for any Diocese to decide for herself whether she shall any longer continue in union with this Council;. . .V. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Oregon-Idaho Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
(Note: in the Journal, the results of the voting are stated by orders. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
Difficulties began when the House of Bishops took up the one Constitutional amendment which had passed at General Convention 1889, namely, an amendment to Article V which would allow General Convention to accept from any diocese a cession of some of its territory, to become a missionary diocese. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
. : Columbia University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF228.G528 J64 2010Gibbons v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BISHOP, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Jim Simons' offer to meet with Bishop Lawrence, I am afraid that based on her past conduct, especially in connection with Bishops Cox and Duncan, she cannot be trusted. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:22 pm
On Friday, the Connecticut Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Bysiewicz v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:48 am
Browne v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm
§ 17-16-842(d) and 831.32 Bishop, supra note 3 at 4. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:33 am
But if a new diocese is formed out of an unorganized area, Article V itself spells out the procedure that is followed: "The proceedings shall originate in a Convocation of the Clergy and Laity of the unorganized area called by the Bishop for that purpose . . . [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
ARMIGER, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
(That is why analogies between the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of ECUSA are inapt.) [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 4:25 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:30 pm
Standard Life Assurance Co. (1995), 15 C.C.E.L. (2d) 71 (N.B.C.A.); Bishop v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:36 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:25 am
This is not, after all, a case like Church of Scientology International v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:30 pm
In 2001, defendant as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, formerly known as the “Holy Office,” formerly known as the “Office of the Inquisition” issued a letter to all bishops of the Catholic Church concerning some “very grave sins” and the secret manner in which they were to be covered up….15. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
