Search for: "Book Review Editor" Results 781 - 800 of 3,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2016, 8:35 am by Ilya Somin
I should perhaps note that, while I was the one who suggested this symposium topic to the student editors, it was not my idea, but theirs, to include a review of my book in the same issue. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:24 pm
On the left will be Isthmus news editor Bill Lueders. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:14 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
I read old reviews in digitised newspaper archives, and trawl obituaries, looking for interesting titbits. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Book reviews (of no more than 1,000 words) are also welcome. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
She advised me when I handed her the book, that it was required by all law review candidates–the board of editors run a program at my school and require the text. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The focus of the book is not on such traditional law but on what makes a signature a signature at all for legal purposes. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 6:45 am
And for an exhaustive set of steps that students should follow when writing and publishing papers, I recommend Eugene Volokh's excellent book, Academic Legal Writing. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm by Stephen Masterson
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Timothy D. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:01 am by Administrator
Editors note: This week’s thinkpiece was timed up to publish concurrently with Judy Gaskell’s review of the same book. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
Moderated by David Ulin, editor of the Los Angeles Times Book Review. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:30 am
The same day brought to my mailbox the April issue of the Michigan Law Review, the always compulsively readable book review issue, which contains my own review of Covering. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
The Carnival travels to a new location each week, facilitated by the good Editor at Blawg Review. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s my thinking on the substantive question (as opposed to the question of whether law review editors are overeager to replace passive voice with the active), from my Academic Legal Writing book.Many people recommend that you turn the passive voice — “The action was done by this person” (the object was verbed by the subject) or just “The action was done” — into the active voice, “This person did this action” (the subject… [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 3:15 am by Tori Hawekotte
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Doron Dorfman, an associate professor at Seton Hall Law, and Thomas F. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:13 pm
"Walking among the anxious runners in the staging area for the race at Fort Wadsworth in Staten Island, sitting in the shadow of the Verazanno-Narrows Bridge, Marty and I found the anonymous Editor of Blawg Review. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 10:19 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
You will, of course, need a book proposal to send to the editor. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:11 am by Steve Lubet
The Jewish Review of Books, to which I subscribe, does this constantly; it’s almost an involuntary reflex of the picture editor. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 6:30 am
The recommended length (including footnotes) is 9,000-12,000 words for articles, 1,500-2,500 words for DiF pieces, and 1,000-1,500 words for book reviews. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 11:30 am by Nate Holdren
That was really nice because I kept a sense of motion - I stayed in the middle - and I was in contact with editors and co-authors. [read post]