Search for: "Born v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
The Secretary of State decided that she was only entitled to a state pension from her 65th birthday. [read post]
26 Mar 2006, 10:23 am
Mr Dubay states he told her many times that he did not want a child and also that his ex assured him repeatedly that because of a physical condition she could not get pregnant. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:12 am
Harris mandates that a wrong be righted, Garden State Equality v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 pm
(iii) It seems to me the parties are generally entitled to state their respective cases in such a statement and their respective admissions. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 8:59 am
Whitt claims the refusal violated the Americans With Disabilities Act and related state laws. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
In Chisholm v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
This one’s very simple and straightforward: become President of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:15 am
Eventually, she ran for the Arizona State Senate and in 1973 was the first woman to be any state’s Majority leader. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:21 pm
Murr v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 2:09 pm
The parties had one child, V.G., born prior to the marriage on December 19, 2018. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:22 pm
United States of America (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlT.W. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 3:07 am
., was born in South Carolina. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 7:14 am
In Stein v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
On Delfi v Estonia… Is it time to adopt a good-Samaritan style exemption? – Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm
It should be born in mind that in L’Oréal v eBay the CJEU stated 3 things: “The fact that the service provided by the operator of an online marketplace includes the storage of information transmitted to it by its customer-sellers is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that that service falls, in all situations, within the scope of Article 14(1) of Directive 2000/31” (at [113]). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:50 am
Parker v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm
It too would be determined in each state by the state's own processes, subject perhaps to the possibility, flagged in the literature on Powell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
Supreme Court hear our defense of S.B. 1070.” (The state’s case is Arizona v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:20 am
In McPherson v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:45 am
Clinton is an effort by a U.S. citizen born in Jerusalem to have “Israel” listed as his birthplace on his passport; the State Department’s long-standing policy is to maintain neutrality with regard to the status of Jerusalem, but in 2002 Congress passed a law instructing the State Department to list Israel as the place of birth for Americans born in Jerusalem. [read post]
