Search for: "Branch v. White"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,456
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2017, 5:23 am
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:13 am
As Quinta and I explained: Under United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 1:14 pm
When Carlson v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:47 pm
The Supreme Court has stated in Department of the Navy v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:46 am
On Wednesday, Trump met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey V. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm
To be sure, Nixon v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:56 am
Lawfare liveblogged both yesterday’s oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of… [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
For example, in many law schools, the sky was falling when United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
In putting the contingency claims forward, the government rests on the Supreme Court’s 1998 case Texas v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:48 am
The flip side, referred to as anti-commandeering, as held by the Supreme Court in NFIB v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
Ought policymakers in the executive branch take tweets from both accounts seriously as guidance, or only from the one? [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
Former White House Counsel Bob Bauer discussed a recent paper he authored dealing with executive transparency and a White House obligation to disclose, and Daphna Renan flagged her recent paper on structures of executive branch legal review at work in the presidential decision-making process. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
* * * In 2002, after my wife and I had sufficiently recovered from Bush v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court two decades ago in Clinton v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:43 am
Steven V. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Ed Whelan, President of the Ethic and Public Policy Center and a leading conservative voice on Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:49 pm
That reminder is all the more important to me now as a reminder that as disastrous as was the election of Donald Trump (and Hillary Clinton is no prize, either, just much less disastrous than Trump), we will have judges and Congress members with the backbone to impose real limits on the actions and power of the White House and the executive branch. [read post]
