Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 9,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm
So when you buy gasoline when the temperature is higher, you get less of it.You still get a gallon. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:20 pm
As noted in my last blog post, the California Supreme Court just reversed the appellate court decision in the case of Steiner v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
Cites to Doe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
The Southern District of New York stated that it was “awarding [the defendant] its fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:12 am
United States, 353 U.S. 346 (1957). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
” Rhode v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:00 pm
In Schumacher v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:05 pm
Lee v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
U-Haul and Hall v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:52 am
10thCir_Ctroom3.jpg In drug distribution trial, detective’s testimony about hearing the defendant’s name mentioned by the cooperating witness as the supplier of the drugs during a controlled buy was inadmissible hearsay since it was erroneously offered for its truth that the defendant was a drug supplier and was not necessary to provide “a coherent story about†the investigation of the defendant; while Tenth Circuit… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 2:23 pm
Under Cetacean Community v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:39 am
In People v Nappo (94 NY2d 564 [2000]), we held that the State was not the “owner” of uncollected taxes within the meaning of the statutory definition of the term because “taxes due were not the property of the State prior to their remittance” (id. at 566). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:36 pm
Lockheed sued Goodyear under Federal and State law seeking to recover costs spent in the environmental cleanup of a facility known as the Airdock. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:31 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:02 am
The evidence of a suitably qualified expert was often required to draw an inference that the seller was aware of the latent defect, and deliberately concealed the defect with the intention to defraud the buyer.In many instances, buyers had neglected to plead and prove the element of fraud, relying solely on the seller's apparent knowledge and failure to disclose.Buyers should take heed of the judgments referred to above and the potential disastrous consequences of buying a property… [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:17 pm
Pfaff v. [read post]
