Search for: "CUSTODY RIGHTS OF T A T R A I"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2008, 10:10 am
Bush, which gave detainees rights to hearings. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:21 am
Some have the ability to work effectively with other attorneys, while others can't get along with anyone. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 8:32 am
And I want to again emphasize (as I will discuss below) that we don’t have any real understanding of the facts at his point. [read post]
31 May 2008, 5:36 pm
She prescribed him new medication and I don't know what right she has to do that. [read post]
15 May 2011, 6:23 am
Clements, Jerry R. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 2:21 am
I can't get my life back. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:08 am
A report I worked on a few years back reviewed thousands of pages of FOIA'd government documents and concluded that nearly 100 detainees had died in U.S. custody as of 2006, at least 8 of whom had been, by any definition, tortured to death.) [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
Div. 3d Dep’t 2004), the family court awarded sole custody of two children to the mother during the divorce, but gave the father visitation rights. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
Div. 3d Dep’t 2004), the family court awarded sole custody of two children to the mother during the divorce, but gave the father visitation rights. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 11:08 am
As famously noted, "[t]hose who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:13 pm
I wasn’t too sure what a divorce coach was at the time either. [read post]
5 May 2021, 2:13 pm
The court held that Zoom hearings don't categorically violate the defendant's right to be present (recognized under the Massachusetts Constitution), right to confront witnesses, right to a public trial, or right to effective assistance of counsel; but it concluded: Here, where there are no civilian witnesses or victims, the harm to the government's case caused by any further delay is minimal. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:51 am
Given the issues raised by the Cotterman case itself, and the issues it raised, I think the majority was basically right. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:08 pm
And, as this court points out, that doesn't mean "upset" the child, it means inflict serious psychological or physical harm. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:17 pm
I've been thinking about it, thinking about it and I can't think of another case. . . . [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Firms may not often have this sort of information readily available, due to siloed information and custodial/privacy concerns. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:02 am
I think this is right, though I disagreed with the appellate court's earlier decision upholding an earlier trial court order in the same case, in which "the father was directed to provide the children with exclusively kosher food and to make 'all reasonable efforts to ensure that the children's appearance and conduct comply with the Hasidic' religious requirements of the [mother] and of the children's schools as they were raised while the… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
It's not their job to remember to pass the message along, get the message right, get an answer and then deliver the response back to you. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:07 pm
Don’t settle for less when determining your rights. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 4:52 pm
I don't doubt it. [read post]
