Search for: "California v. May"
Results 781 - 800
of 26,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2014, 2:33 pm
By:David Gabor On December 30, 2013, the Federal Court of Appeals, in Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
In Brown v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:00 am
In Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
At its Conference on May 1, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s untainted assets under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, and preemption of California’s meal and rest break laws. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:23 pm
As we have previously reported here, California Assembly Bill 5 (the bill) is slated to codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:02 am
Last year, the California Supreme Court denied review in Milpitas v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm
Jaimez appears to be the first published California Court of Appeal decision since the issuance of Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 9:20 am
Workplaces that fail to accommodate a worker’s injury or disability may be rightly sued for California employment discrimination. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:02 pm
In 2021, the California Supreme Court held in Donohue v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 9:33 am
The California Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument on three land use and CEQA cases in early May in San Francisco. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 2:11 pm
In a 2011 decision, Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 10:30 am
Monroe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Board of Trustees of the California State University (CSU). [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 12:37 pm
Waaaaaayy outside our usual jurisdiction, but California appellate lawyers may be interested in reading this post by “S. [read post]
18 May 2021, 10:25 am
In 2019, the California legislature enacted AB 5 to codify the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex West Operations, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 5:23 pm
It applies when you may not have a drug on you, but you could still access it. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:49 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court set oral argument in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:50 am
I get it.P.S. - While we're on the subject of Google, I think that today may be the least productive Friday of the entire year. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 3:57 pm
Employment laws are constantly changing, so we suggest you contact us for updated information.Yesterday the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Gattuso v. [read post]
