Search for: "Church v. York" Results 781 - 800 of 1,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Esbeck, University of Missouri School of Law, has posted The Establishment Clause: What the Text and Record in the First Federal Congress Can Tell Us About Original Meaning:Modern times in church-state relations began in 1947 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Everson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 9:17 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In New York, that means you have 300 days to file with the EEOC, which then investigates the case and may try to reach a settlement. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The population is nearly 100 percent Hasidic, making the community something of an enclave quite unlike anyplace else in upstate New York. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse considers Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:55 am by Eoin Daly
An atheist group in New York has filed a suit in response to the erection of a crucifix at the ground zero site. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:33 pm by Darrin Mish
According to the law, non-profit non-church organizations are subject to greater regulations than are churches. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:56 pm
Illegal depiction of man in New York subway scene. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Take, for example, New York County Supreme Court Justice Ellen Gesmer’s February 29, 2012 decision in M.R. v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm by Josh Blackman
San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority] A few moments ago, I blogged about South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
That one way is spelled out, in very clear words, in Article V of ECUSA's Constitution, and it has not changed in over 200 years. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 2:23 pm by Matt Murphy
 As New York’s highest court explained, there is no “absolute right for a religiously-affiliated employer to structure all aspects of its relationship with its employees in conformity with church teachings. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Review, Evan Seeman looks at the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:04 am by Susan I. Nelson
Alabama still can’t bar them from enrolling, since the Supreme Court declared in Plyler v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons elaborates on the implications of Rucho v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
Co., 240 AD2d 452, 454 [1997]; Roman Catholic Church of Good Shepherd v Tempco Sys., 202 AD2d 257, 258 [1994]; Paramount Ins. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” In a column for The New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses Tanzin v. [read post]