Search for: "Cooper v State" Results 781 - 800 of 8,564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2022, 8:52 am by Erik W. Weibust
As we have previously written in Law360, it is questionable whether the FTC even has the authority to regulate, much less prohibit, noncompetes, particularly following the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 6:06 am by Rebecca Barber
The ICJ has only considered a State’s responsibility for genocide twice before – the Bosnian Genocide Case judgment of 2007 and Croatia v Servia in 2015. [read post]
The MSAs shall also cooperate with ENISA and the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:21 am by Ralf Michaels
ilište u Zagrebu, Croatia, Universitatea Sapientia din municipiul Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici, Slovakia, Uniwersytet ? [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:30 pm by Russell Knight
Cooperation between counsel and good-faith efforts by them to resolve disputes without judicial intervention are essential to the efficient and expeditious administration of justice in this State” Spiller v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 10:29 pm by Florian Mueller
They don't make the decision, but both the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) presiding over the investigation and, ultimately, the Commission (the U.S. trade agency's top-level decision-making body) often find the staff's input useful.Discovery disputes between private parties are normal--and it's equally normal that companies being investigated or sued by antitrust enforcers dispute the scope of discovery requests (I've been watching that for a while now in United… [read post]
§ 793, prohibits “willfully retain[ing]” information “relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” and “fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it” (emphasis added). [read post]