Search for: "Creek v State"
Results 781 - 800
of 936
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:36 am
MANILA - In the aftermath of typhoon Ondoy, many were quick to blame the urban poor living along the creeks, waterways and riverbanks of Metro Manila. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
to pay 23% ongoing royalty for future infringement: Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 10:53 am
Case Name: Horse Creek Conservation District and Phase 23, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
Aspen Creek Estates Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:20 pm
Aspen Creek Estates Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19] Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:52 am
Ct. 2008); Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:53 pm
The petitioners also urge the court to weigh the relative public vs. private benefits that would occur as a result of the project as called for in Aspen Creek v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
" They also argue the ESDC failed "to weigh the public benefit that will be realized by the seizure against the benefit that will accrue to the recipient of [the] property," as required under Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v Town of Brookhaven (12 NY3d 735). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:59 am
State, 160 P.3d 507 (Mont. 2007); Gamble v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:13 am
Craig v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:42 am
Williams Download Plum Creek Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
