Search for: "DC v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 3,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 9:18 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm
Committee of Neighbors Directly Impacted by Lamb Application v District of Columbia Board of Adjustment, 2019 WL 5617815 (DC CA 10/31/2019) [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm
As I pointed out in a prior post the 1983 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 3:58 pm
Conference of Mayors in the case U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
Yesterday, at the State of the Net conference in Washington DC, a report by the ‘Internet Safety Technical Task Force‘ was launched. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:52 pm
ACCA’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:06 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:14 am
Case citation: United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:26 am
Hadeed is a large carpet-cleaning and carpet-repair business operating throughout the DC metropolitan area. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am
Rother DC v Freeman-Loach [2018] EWCA Civ 368 is the latest installment on the interpretation of vulnerability for the purposes of homelessness law, with a sting in the tail about s 204A appeals. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:08 am
Westrick v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
”) and Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:25 am
§103, in light of precedential decisions from the Federal Circuit issued since the United States Supreme Court decision in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
‘Member State’ shall mean a Member State of the European Union. 3. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:07 pm
See The Robare Group, Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
