Search for: "DEAL v. DEAL" Results 781 - 800 of 43,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2007, 10:49 pm
It did so in Pozzoli SPA v BDMO SA and others [2007] EWCA Civ 588 (available here in full on BAILII), a ruling on Friday 22 June 2007. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 7:25 am by Michael DelSignore
Edward Long, SJC-12868, that deal with the issue of disparity treatment and discriminatory enforcement of traffic laws by the Boston police. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:13 am by CorporateAcquisitions MergerLawBlogger
I was cleaning off my desktop and came across an interesting letter opinion in which the Chancery Court deals with the question of selecting a lead plaintiff (SEPTA v Rubin et al). [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:50 am
A panel in Vegas discussed the Delaware Chancery case on Apollo v Huntsman. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm by Legal Skills Prof
The case deals with alleged exclusion of African American citizens from a jury (Foster v. [read post]