Search for: "DISTRICT VENUES LLC"
Results 781 - 800
of 835
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Effect of a stipulated dismissal: Garber v Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the Chicago Board of Trade (Patently-O) BPAI speaks on ‘transformation’ prong: Ex Parte Hardwick (12:01 Tuesday) ITC issues final determination of s 337 violation in investigation based on complaint lodged by Samsung against Sharp concerning LCD devices (ITC 337 Law Blog) ITC decides not to review enforcement initial determination that… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step) District… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step) District… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 1:04 am
Judge Baer's opinion in Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:16 am
LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
The Employer promotes, stages, and presents music concerts at multiple venues, including the Tweeter Center, a summer-season facility in Mansfield, MA. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 5:35 pm
Cir. 2008) Venue: Ordered transfer of venue from the Eastern District of Texas to the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:54 pm
Cir. 2008) Venue: Ordered transfer of venue from the Eastern District of Texas to the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Worries about our patent system (The Invent Blog) US Patents Licensing Executives Society urges… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness: Pivonka v… [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:02 am
Co-defendant Internet Community Partners, LLC, dba ffcobra.com, joined in Factory Five's motion. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 8:32 am
MHL TEK, LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Max Rave, LLC, 529 F. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Max Rave, LLC, 529 F. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Max Rave, LLC, 529 F. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 8:12 am
LDM Group, LLC, (2-07-cv-00477) TXED Judge: T. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 11:55 pm
LDM Group, LLC, 2-07-cv-00477 (TXED January 29, 2009, Order) [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:49 am
AOL LLC, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 12:56 pm
The "industry" begins and ends with Saxon, a company that fits neatly within the definition of what some patent reform advocates call a "patent troll": five employees, no products or services, a growing trail of litigation, and a leased office in the Eastern District of Texas, a popular venue with patent plaintiffs.Read the whole story at AmLaw Daily: A New Troll Hangout? [read post]
