Search for: "DNS"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 2:17 am
Lebanon Index/La France DN and Elie Khouri, D2002-0760 (WIPO November 1, 2002) rejected the Respondent’s argument that a complaint must be filed by a single complainant. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 6:45 pm
Things might get odd for a bit until the dust settles…..Then the DNS change will have to propagate to where you are, and so on. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:42 pm
" The challenge specifically suggests creating apps that can monitor whether ISPs are "interfering with DNS responses, application packet headers, or content. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 2:11 pm
.; Aneesard Management LLC; DN Management Co. [read post]
ALJ Charneski Grants Motion To Terminate Investigation In Certain Data Storage Products (337-TA-748)
22 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm
DNS further indicated that the same claims at issue in the Texas litigation were the same claims at issue in this investigation. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:49 pm
Akamai Technologies, with MIT riding shotgun, asserted: 6,108,703; 6,553,413; & 7,103,645 against Limelight Networks. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:07 am
Arbor Networks, another DDoS protection firm mentioned in the Globe article also lists a variety of security services beyond enlarging the "pipe:" protecting DNS architecture (I wish Comcast would sign up with them!) [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
The Report recalls how the Commerce Department effectively convened multi-stakeholder groups to develop Domain Name System (DNS) policy. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 7:10 am
The Report recalls how the Commerce Department effectively convened multi-stakeholder groups to develop Domain Name System (DNS) policy. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:03 am
Referring to this public comment, the ICANN Board identified a number of “overarching issues” that it believed warranted further consideration: trademark protection, mitigating malicious conduct, impact on the DNS root zone server system, economic issues, what to do with geographic names and morality issues. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
First Wikileaks lost its domain and had to move to a Swedish extension, then had issues with its DNS provider pulling out. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:48 pm
Again like every self respecting blogger on the planet, I have written a short comment for the Grauniad on Wikileaks.The main thrust of the point I was making is that settling a dispute of major public consequence by covert and non-legitimate bully boy tactics - covert pressure on hosts, payment services and DNS servers, plus DDOS attacks on Wikileaks hosts from the US-sympathising side - and anonymous DDOS attacks on sites like Amazon, Mastercard and Assange's alleged rape… [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm
The order: direct[ed] the current registrar to disable or change the domain name server (DNS) information for the allegedly infringing domain name and place the domain name on hold and lock for the pendency of the litigation. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 12:30 pm
At the very least, they're experiencing serious DNS issues. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:27 pm
WikiLeaks expanded from using a single DNS provider to using 14 different DNS providers. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:08 pm
” Adding to the confusion, the site anonops.info is reporting that their DNS provider ENOM has cut services to the domain hosting the chat channels, and that the operation is suffering from its own popularity and outside attacks. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:35 am
The alternative whistleblower site created by WikiLeaks defectors may launch sooner than later, according to Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter (DN). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:05 pm
A DNS provider that suffered backlash last week after it was wrongly identified as supplying and then dropping DNS service to WikiLeaks has decided to support the secret-spilling site, offering DNS service to two domains distributing WikiLeaks content. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:02 pm
Then the Wikileaks domain was removed by their DNS provider. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:19 pm
While Every DNS, the world’s largest free-managed DNS provider, is not taking a position on the content hosted on the wikileaks.org or wikileaks.ch website, it says it is following established policies in shutting down WikiLeaks. [read post]
