Search for: "Deal v. USA"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
V. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
In Gregg v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:57 am
It seems Mr Brailsford may well have coined the mark and used it in the USA. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am
HarvardLaw74 Backup file made by TweetBackup 2012-08-02 15:24:182012-08-02 14:03:54 HarvardLaw74: RT @KeithDarce: Private financing of digital health tripled in 1st half of 2012 to $499B http://t.co/cGPJP6wI via HealthTechZone #startups [Non Social media driven Healthcare startups have the immediate opportunity to achieve solid revenues in an expanding domestic and international market] http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2308613732094730262012-08-02 00:22:42 HarvardLaw74: 482 recently… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Frye v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Frye v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:07 am
What is the Financial Advisor's Role in a Deal? [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
Cascades Computer Innovations, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
The Court said what it meant and meant what is said in CCH v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
Regular IPKat readers will know that I got quite excited about the Apple/Samsung litigation in the UK, which concerned Apple’s Registered Community Design 000181607-0001 (“the RCD”) and various of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab tablet computers, and I posted about it a great deal [see eg posts here, here and here]. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
Regular IPKat readers will know that I got quite excited about the Apple/Samsung litigation in the UK, which concerned Apple’s Registered Community Design 000181607-0001 (“the RCD”) and various of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab tablet computers, and I posted about it a great deal [see eg posts here, here and here]. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
Regular IPKat readers will know that I got quite excited about the Apple/Samsung litigation in the UK, which concerned Apple’s Registered Community Design 000181607-0001 (“the RCD”) and various of Samsung’s Galaxy Tab tablet computers, and I posted about it a great deal [see eg posts here, here and here]. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
Part I is at this link, Part II is at this link, Part III may be read here, and Part V, the conclusion, will appear tomorrow.]In the first three parts of this series (linked above), we analyzed Article X of the Constitution concerning amendments and additions to the liturgy of the Episcopal Church (USA), and saw how it would be impossible for the present General Convention, meeting in Indianapolis, to adopt a rite for same-sex blessings… [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 2:30 pm
The 1994 Campbell v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
End of Proceedings: This case deals with important questions on writs of habeas corpus and the implications for foreign relations in requesting the release of a suspect by a foreign sovereign state. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 6:03 am
Universal, Lewis Galoob v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
In the Cogeco Cable Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
See Roberts Rules for Order by Hendrik Hertzberg at The New Yorker (the image below is linked from the Wikipedia): In a nip-and-tuck 5-4 decision (read the opinion here) in a case formally titled National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
Francis Fitzgibbon QC analyses the legal issues in a very clear blog post - Julian the Asylum Seeker - pointing out, that in any event, Sweden would not be able to extradite Assange to the USA without the consent of the British home secretary until any charges put are proved in court, at which time Sweden would not be permitted by the European Convention to order authorisation to the USA if there was any prospect of Assange facing the death penalty. [read post]
